| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Alex bahdushka <bahdushka(at)gmail(dot)com>, Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] PANIC: heap_update_redo: no block |
| Date: | 2006-03-28 16:27:10 |
| Message-ID: | 2788.1143563230@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
"Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 10:07:35AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, in fact we'll have correctly recreated the page, so I'm not
>> thinking that it's necessary or desirable to check this.
> Would the suggestion made in
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-05/msg01374.php help
> in this regard?
That's exactly what we are debating: whether it's still necessary/useful
to make such a check, given that we now realize the failures are just
isolated bugs and not a systemic problem with truncated files.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | karly | 2006-03-28 16:31:35 | Re: FAQ 1.1 |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-03-28 16:26:26 | Re: table owner of cloned databases |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-03-28 16:31:33 | Re: Why are default encoding conversions |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-28 16:24:51 | Re: Why are default encoding conversions |