Re: repeat() function, CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS(), and unlikely()

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: repeat() function, CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS(), and unlikely()
Date: 2020-05-25 13:52:13
Message-ID: 27833.1590414733@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>> Comments or objections?

> Seeing none ... I intend to backpatch and push these two patches in the next day
> or so.

There was some question as to what (if anything) to do with the Windows
version of CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS. Have you resolved that?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2020-05-25 14:10:43 Re: repeat() function, CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS(), and unlikely()
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-05-25 13:43:32 Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch