Re: Unique constaint violated without being violated

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Richard Broersma" <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Sebastian Tennant" <sebyte(at)smolny(dot)plus(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unique constaint violated without being violated
Date: 2008-12-08 17:31:12
Message-ID: 27818.1228757472@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Richard Broersma" <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Does this mean the PostgreSQL supports row-wise updates? When did this happen?

Only sort of ...
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-09/msg00021.php

I didn't want this applied
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-07/msg00246.php
but I got outvoted.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Liraz Siri 2008-12-08 17:40:15 spreading the word on new PostgreSQL software appliance
Previous Message Richard Broersma 2008-12-08 17:02:34 Re: Unique constaint violated without being violated