Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc
Date: 2016-03-02 06:07:33
Message-ID: 27801.1456898853@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Yes, that's the problem. Instead of using details(), summary() is
> enough actually. And it is enough to let caller know the failure when
> just one test has been found as not passing. See attached.

This one works for me on RHEL6. Pushed; we'll see if the older
buildfarm members like it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2016-03-02 06:12:27 Re: GetExistingLocalJoinPath() vs. the docs
Previous Message David Fetter 2016-03-02 05:53:17 Re: 2016-03 Commitfest Manager