From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Tutorial |
Date: | 2004-07-23 20:30:40 |
Message-ID: | 27773.1090614640@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> I don't consider the concept broken. The implementation is, in fact,
> broken, and putting that broken piece in the tutorial is, imnsho, a
> bad mistake.
If we're going to remove from the tutorial every feature for which any
aspect is deemed by someone to be broken, the tutorial is liable to
become quite short.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2004-07-23 20:40:36 | Re: [HACKERS] Tutorial |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2004-07-23 20:28:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Tutorial |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Mascari | 2004-07-23 20:39:05 | Re: ffunc called multiple for same value |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2004-07-23 20:28:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Tutorial |