Re: [HACKERS] Tutorial

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>,Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>,Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>,pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Tutorial
Date: 2004-07-23 20:30:40
Message-ID: 27773.1090614640@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> I don't consider the concept broken. The implementation is, in fact,
> broken, and putting that broken piece in the tutorial is, imnsho, a
> bad mistake.

If we're going to remove from the tutorial every feature for which any
aspect is deemed by someone to be broken, the tutorial is liable to
become quite short.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2004-07-23 20:40:36 Re: [HACKERS] Tutorial
Previous Message David Fetter 2004-07-23 20:28:22 Re: [HACKERS] Tutorial

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Mascari 2004-07-23 20:39:05 Re: ffunc called multiple for same value
Previous Message David Fetter 2004-07-23 20:28:22 Re: [HACKERS] Tutorial