Re: PG 18 relnotes and RC1

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: PG 18 relnotes and RC1
Date: 2025-09-18 16:59:13
Message-ID: 27750E70-A26F-414F-B31B-A976831A0E51@postgresql.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Sep 18, 2025, at 12:20 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 12:09 PM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>> Please see attached draft for the major features of PostgreSQL 18.
>
> I like Nathan's version better. I suggest we go with that one.

Why? This seems arbitrary without more details.

I’ve spent the past several weeks staring at the release notes, talking to users, and putting together a presentation on it that was delivered last night, also culminating in the press release. I put a lot of effort into researching what to highlight up top, which is augmented in the release details itself. Additionally I started from what Nathan had and tweaked a few items.

If there something you specifically disagree with I’d like to better understand.

Jonathan

> --
> Robert Haas
> EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2025-09-18 17:08:49 Updating IPC::Run in CI?
Previous Message Sami Imseih 2025-09-18 16:52:05 Re: PgStat_HashKey padding issue when passed by reference