Re: Cross-backend signals and administration (Was: Re: pg_terminate_backend for same-role)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cross-backend signals and administration (Was: Re: pg_terminate_backend for same-role)
Date: 2012-03-20 17:13:01
Message-ID: 27746.1332263581@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Maybe we should just not worry about this.

That's been my reaction right along. There's no evidence that PID
recycling is a problem in the real world.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2012-03-20 17:19:47 Re: Regarding column reordering project for GSoc 2012
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-03-20 17:07:50 Re: Cross-backend signals and administration (Was: Re: pg_terminate_backend for same-role)