From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Documenting removal of nonnullvalue() and friends |
Date: | 2011-03-03 06:53:05 |
Message-ID: | 27746.1299135185@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
I wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I thought about this a bit more last night. It's certainly true that
>>> a lot of "internal" functions have comments that don't suggest that
>>> they're not meant to be used directly. What I think would be a good
>>> plan for functions that underlie operators is that we move any useful
>>> comments from pg_proc to pg_operator, and then install a comment in
>>> pg_proc that says "implementation of operator +" (or whatever the
>>> operator name is).
>>> ...
>>> If that sounds like a reasonable plan, I'm willing to have a go at it
>>> after the commitfest closes.
>> Tom, any work on this? A TODO?
> I haven't done anything about this yet, but it's still on my to-do list.
Done now.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thom Brown | 2011-03-07 09:57:18 | Sync rep doc corrections |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-03-02 20:58:21 | Re: Change to kernel-resources |