Re: SEGV in contrib/array/array_iterator.c

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Cc: Matt Peterson <matt(at)caldera(dot)com>, dz(at)cs(dot)unitn(dot)it, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SEGV in contrib/array/array_iterator.c
Date: 2002-04-02 20:54:18
Message-ID: 27737.1017780858@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm ... isn't it NULL anyway, if the left side is NULL?

> I think the empty case is special, due to the rules on <quantified
> comparison predicate>s.

[ reads spec... ] Yeah, I think you are right.

Looks like our subplan implementation gets it right, too.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pierre-Alexis Paquin 2002-04-03 09:02:42 Bugs report
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-04-02 20:32:37 Re: huh!?