Keith Pierno <kpierno(at)lulu(dot)com> writes:
> The backup used was from well after the failover time which is why I
> was concerned. Interestingly enough the logs are still all prefixed
> with 00000004... That just makes this problem extremely bizarre.
Hmm, that *is* weird. It seems like the new primary must have reverted
its decision to go from timeline 4 to timeline 6. (Which in itself is
a bit odd; why not timeline 5?)
Can you give us an exact sequence of events on the slave server/new
primary around the time of the failover? Also, what was in the .history
file when you found it, and are there any other history files?
regards, tom lane