Re: New GUC to sample log queries

From: Adrien Nayrat <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New GUC to sample log queries
Date: 2018-06-24 11:22:55
Message-ID: 276e308f-8bd5-1d14-094f-0d295b414a31@anayrat.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/31/2018 03:22 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 02:37:07PM +0200, Adrien Nayrat wrote:
>> On 05/31/2018 03:34 AM, David Rowley wrote:
>>> On 31 May 2018 at 06:44, Adrien Nayrat <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info> wrote:
>>>> Here is a naive SELECT only bench with a dataset which fit in ram (scale factor
>>>> = 100) and PGDATA and log on a ramdisk:
>>>> shared_buffers = 4GB
>>>> seq_page_cost = random_page_cost = 1.0
>>>> logging_collector = on (no rotation)
>>>
>>> It would be better to just: SELECT 1; to try to get the true overhead
>>> of the additional logging code.
>>
>> Right, I wonder why I didn't have the idea :)
>
> Using prepared statements help also in reducing the load with
> unnecessary planning.
> --
> Michael
>

Thanks, but the winner is Julien Rouhaud with only ";", I reach 115K TPS on my
laptop :)

Attached third version of the patch with documentation.

--
Adrien NAYRAT

Attachment Content-Type Size
sample_rate-3.patch text/x-patch 4.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-06-24 11:27:14 Re: Invisible Indexes
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2018-06-24 11:07:44 Re: Desirability of client-side expressions in psql?