Re: Inconsistency between TO_CHAR() and TO_NUMBER()

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inconsistency between TO_CHAR() and TO_NUMBER()
Date: 2013-05-13 14:09:18
Message-ID: 2768.1368454158@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> writes:
> Would it be possible to be lenient, and also accept . as the decimal
> separator, when there is no ambiguity? Ie. when . is not the thousands
> separator.

I originally coded it that way, but concluded that it was probably a
waste of code space. How many locales can you point to where neither
the decimal point nor thousands_sep is "."? It certainly wouldn't be
enough to noticeably reduce the potential pain from this change, so
I decided that it'd be better to keep the behavior straightforward
and as-documented.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-05-13 14:24:55 Re: BUG #8154: pg_dump throws error beacause of field called "new".
Previous Message willybas 2013-05-13 14:00:16 BUG #8154: pg_dump throws error beacause of field called "new".