From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes |
Date: | 2018-08-09 02:40:51 |
Message-ID: | 27669.1533782451@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 4:07 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> I don't immediately see it being responsible, but I wonder if there's a
>> chance it actually is: Note that it happens in a parallel group that
>> includes vacuum.sql, which does a VACUUM FULL pg_class - but I still
>> don't immediately see how it could apply.
> Anyway, "VACUUM FULL pg_class" should be expected to corrupt
> pg_class_oid_index when we happen to get a parallel build, since
> pg_class is a mapped relation, and I've identified that as a problem
> for parallel CREATE INDEX [2]. If that was the ultimate cause of the
> issue, it would explain why only REL_11_STABLE and master are
> involved.
Oooh ... but pg_class wouldn't be big enough to get a parallel
index rebuild during that test, would it?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-08-09 03:02:32 | Re: Temporary tables prevent autovacuum, leading to XID wraparound |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2018-08-09 01:42:56 | Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes |