| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |
| Date: | 2020-04-13 23:48:35 |
| Message-ID: | 2765.1586821715@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> I don't think I like the <hr/> version better than <br/> --- it adds
> quite a bit of vertical space, more than I was expecting really.
Actually, after staring more at HTML-hr.png, what's *really* bothering
me about that rendering is that the lines made by <hr/> are actually
wider than the inter-table-cell lines. Surely we want the opposite
relationship. Presumably that could be fixed with some css-level
adjustments; and maybe the spacing could be tightened up a bit too?
I do like having that visual separation, it just needs to be toned
down compared to the table cell separators.
Reproducing the effect in the PDF build remains an issue, too.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-04-13 23:50:52 | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |
| Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2020-04-13 23:38:15 | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |