Re: pg_dump, pg_restore, insert vs copy

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Lee Wu <Lwu(at)mxlogic(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump, pg_restore, insert vs copy
Date: 2005-03-24 16:51:08
Message-ID: 27632.1111683068@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> Is there any reason why we don't use a binary storage in custom format
> dumps? I mean, we could open a binary cursor and write the results to
> the file, and read it back at restore time. This is just handwaving of
> course.

> I guess the reason is cross-version portability?

Cross-platform portability, too.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Olivier Martineau 2005-03-24 17:46:47 Re: How to move the ...
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-03-24 16:44:33 Re: pg_dump, pg_restore, insert vs copy