| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: new version of contrib-intarray |
| Date: | 2001-03-18 23:45:52 |
| Message-ID: | 27629.984959152@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I only saw that the Makefile is back to how it looked at rev 1.1 before I
> did some work on it. AFAICT the Makefile should be reverted back to the
> previous revision, since the code change does not require any changes to
> the Makefile.
I did this, also reinstalled the include-file changes I had made, and
then spent several fruitless hours trying to find why the "intbig" index
operators fail selftest here (on HP-PA). I suppose it's a portability
problem, since presumably they pass for Oleg ... but I don't see it.
Who else finds that the new contrib/intarray code passes or fails its
selftest, and on what platforms?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-18 23:47:22 | Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC |
| Previous Message | Alfred Perlstein | 2001-03-18 22:48:31 | Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC |