Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> ... I wonder if it would be more practical to just write:
> The name of the object to be commented. Names of objects that live
> in schemas (tables, functions, etc.) can be schema-qualified.
+1 for the concept, but I feel that "live in" is a bit too informal
for this context. I'm too caffeine-deprived to instantly come up
with le mot juste; but perhaps "exist within" would be an improvement?
regards, tom lane