Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Pierre Giraud <pierre(dot)giraud(at)dalibo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Date: 2020-04-16 17:03:36
Message-ID: 27619.1587056616@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pierre Giraud <pierre(dot)giraud(at)dalibo(dot)com> writes:
> Le 16/04/2020 à 16:43, Tom Lane a écrit :
>> Pierre Giraud <pierre(dot)giraud(at)dalibo(dot)com> writes:
>>> The screenshot attached uses a <dl> tag for the descrition/example block.

>> That looks about right, perhaps, but could you be a little clearer about
>> how you accomplished that?

> Attached you will find the HTML structure with associated styles.
> Sorry I haven't tried to do this from the DocBook sources.
> I hope this helps though.

After a bit of poking at it, I couldn't find another way to do that
than using a <variablelist> structure. Which is an annoying amount
of markup to be adding to each table cell, but I guess we could live
with it. A bigger problem is that docbook applies styles to the
<dl> structure that, at least by default, add a LOT of vertical space.
Doesn't seem real workable unless we can undo that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-04-16 17:10:37 Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Previous Message Cary Huang 2020-04-16 16:45:06 Re: Include sequence relation support in logical replication