Re: Documentation of bt_page_items()'s ctid field

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Documentation of bt_page_items()'s ctid field
Date: 2015-03-12 18:19:43
Message-ID: 27532.1426184383@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I think we do want this. It was asked how much we want to include
> internals of the btree code into pageinspect documentation, but I think the
> nature of pageinspect makes that unavoidable.

Yeah. Committed with a little bit of additional wordsmithing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-03-12 18:48:25 Re: get_object_address support for additional object types
Previous Message Stas Kelvich 2015-03-12 17:43:07 Re: Cube extension kNN support