| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/ref/psql-ref.sgml rc ... |
| Date: | 2002-11-08 20:40:23 |
| Message-ID: | 27495.1036788023@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Wasn't that patch rejected in favor of doing it another way? I thought
>> we were going to make the use-the-pager decision depend on width as well
>> as height, so that it would work automatically instead of needing an
>> "always" kluge.
> His reply was that there is no way to know what pager they chose and how
> it handles wide output (wrap or horizontal scroll), so he felt we still
> need the option.
That argument seems to miss the point: if your pager doesn't handle
horizontal scroll, so what? I don't see how you lose anything if the
system invokes the pager on wide-but-short displays. It can't be worse
than not invoking the pager, can it?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-08 20:43:21 | Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/ref/psql-ref.sgml rc ... |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-08 20:26:12 | pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml regress.sgml |