Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/ref/psql-ref.sgml rc ...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/ref/psql-ref.sgml rc ...
Date: 2002-11-08 20:40:23
Message-ID: 27495.1036788023@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Wasn't that patch rejected in favor of doing it another way? I thought
>> we were going to make the use-the-pager decision depend on width as well
>> as height, so that it would work automatically instead of needing an
>> "always" kluge.

> His reply was that there is no way to know what pager they chose and how
> it handles wide output (wrap or horizontal scroll), so he felt we still
> need the option.

That argument seems to miss the point: if your pager doesn't handle
horizontal scroll, so what? I don't see how you lose anything if the
system invokes the pager on wide-but-short displays. It can't be worse
than not invoking the pager, can it?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-08 20:43:21 Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/ref/psql-ref.sgml rc ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-11-08 20:26:12 pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml regress.sgml