Re: Teach predtest about IS [NOT] <boolean> proofs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Teach predtest about IS [NOT] <boolean> proofs
Date: 2024-03-26 03:45:42
Message-ID: 2748195.1711424742@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> I went ahead and committed 0001 after one more round of review
>
> statements; my bad). I also added the changes in test_predtest.c from
> 0002. I attach a rebased version of 0002, as well as 0003 which isn't
> changed, mainly to keep the cfbot happy.

[ squint.. ] Apparently I managed to hit ^K right before sending this
email. The missing line was meant to be more or less

> which found a couple of missing "break"

Not too important, but perhaps future readers of the archives will
be confused.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2024-03-26 03:56:07 Re: Recent 027_streaming_regress.pl hangs
Previous Message Andres Freund 2024-03-26 03:28:34 Re: Sync scan & regression tests