MOVE LAST: why?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: MOVE LAST: why?
Date: 2003-01-07 23:07:18
Message-ID: 27476.1041980838@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

> 2002-11-12 19:44 momjian
>
> * doc/src/sgml/ref/move.sgml, src/backend/commands/portalcmds.c,
> src/backend/executor/execMain.c, src/backend/parser/gram.y,
> src/backend/parser/keywords.c, src/backend/tcop/utility.c,
> src/include/commands/portalcmds.h, src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h:
> Make MOVE/FETCH 0 actually move/fetch 0. Add MOVE LAST to move to
> end of cursor.

Refresh my memory: what is the point of inventing an additional LAST
keyword, when the behavior is exactly the same as MOVE ALL ?

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 2003-01-07 23:07:36 Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Previous Message Dave Page 2003-01-07 23:05:06 Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gerhard Häring 2003-01-07 23:28:53 Re: [ADMIN] pgdb.py is still wrong in Postgres 7.3.1 rpm
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-01-07 22:51:43 Re: [BUGS] pgdb.py is still wrong [not just] in Postgres 7.3.1