From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: renaming configure.in to configure.ac |
Date: | 2020-08-25 16:44:25 |
Message-ID: | 2746890.1598373865@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2020-07-24 15:23, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Sounds good. Do we want to try Noah's idea of temporarily committing
>> the remaining changes, to see if the buildfarm is happy?
> I think to get value out of this you'd have to compare the config.status
> output files (mainly pg_config.h and Makefile.global) before and after.
> Otherwise you're just testing that the shell can parse the script.
> Perhaps some manual tests on, say, AIX and HP-UX using the native shell
> would be of some value.
I already did that on assorted boxes, using the patches you previously
posted [1]. Do you think there's value in re-doing it manually,
rather than just having at it with the buildfarm?
(I did not try to test whether the configure script itself could be
regenerated on an ancient platform; I doubt we care.)
regards, tom lane
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/30379.1595117752%40sss.pgh.pa.us
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-08-25 16:59:31 | Re: some unused parameters cleanup |
Previous Message | Ranier Vilela | 2020-08-25 16:19:33 | [PATCH] Fix Uninitialized scalar variable (UNINIT) (src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c) |