From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: "make install" now tries to build the documentation |
Date: | 2009-08-18 19:13:57 |
Message-ID: | 27421.1250622837@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On tis, 2009-08-18 at 14:32 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm leaning more towards the "make install-docs" solution after further
>> thought. One thing that's always been a bit bogus about make install
>> is that it installs the docs only if they're there. With a separate
>> top-level target, it would be reasonable to throw an error if the
>> docs aren't there and can't be built.
> I don't think we should impose an additional burden on the users because
> of some glitches in the workflow of some developers. There can be
> another solution. We can add an option or a make target or whatever to
> refine the behavior in a developer environment.
Well, having "make install" behave in a history-dependent fashion is just
as much a hazard for users as it is for developers.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Euler Taveira de Oliveira | 2009-08-18 19:43:42 | Re: fillfactor hides autovacuum parameters in 8.4.0 |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-08-18 19:07:05 | Re: "make install" now tries to build the documentation |