Re: add_path optimization

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: add_path optimization
Date: 2009-02-27 23:39:38
Message-ID: 27416.1235777978@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

After a lot of distractions, I've finished applying the planner fixes
that seem necessary in view of your report about poorer planning in 8.4
than 8.3. When you have a chance, it would be useful to do a thorough
test of CVS HEAD on your data and query mix --- are there any other
places where we have regressed relative to 8.3?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Pye 2009-02-28 02:19:51 Re: xpath processing brain dead
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2009-02-27 23:37:51 Re: xpath processing brain dead