Re: Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)
Date: 2017-04-13 16:56:14
Message-ID: 27409.1492102574@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> Cool. I wonder if we also should remove AtEOXact_CatCache()'s
> cross-checks - the resowner replacement has been in place for a while,
> and seems robust enough. They're now the biggest user of time.

Hm, biggest user of time in what workload? I've not noticed that
function particularly.

I agree that it doesn't seem like we need to spend a lot of time
cross-checking there, though. Maybe keep the code but #ifdef it
under some nondefault debugging symbol.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-04-13 17:04:12 Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-04-13 16:53:27 Re: Re: Query fails when SRFs are part of FROM clause (Commit id: 69f4b9c85f)