Re: quieting DEBUG3

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: quieting DEBUG3
Date: 2015-10-28 00:51:11
Message-ID: 27395.1445993471@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I think it'd be helpful to define some level of policy about what the
> debug levels are intended for, so there's some guidance on what level
> to emit messages on rather than playing "pick a number".

+1 ... I doubt anyone has ever looked at that in a holistic way.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-10-28 01:45:18 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Cleanup commit timestamp module activaction, again
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-10-28 00:48:17 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Cleanup commit timestamp module activaction, again