From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)berkus(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. |
Date: | 2017-08-10 16:40:29 |
Message-ID: | 27393f4c-3a12-4055-8d18-436e340d7ea5@berkus.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/09/2017 10:49 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
>>> This item appears under "decisions to recheck mid-beta". If anyone is going
>>> to push for a change here, now is the time.
>>
>> It has been 1 week since the previous mail. I though that there were
>> others argued to change the behavior of old-style setting so that a
>> quorum commit is chosen. If nobody is going to push for a change we
>> can live with the current behavior?
>
> FWIW, I still see no harm in keeping backward-compatibility here, so I
> am in favor of a statu-quo.
>
I am vaguely in favor of making quorum the default over "ordered".
However, given that anybody using sync commit without
understanding/customizing the setup is going to be sorry regardless,
keeping backwards compatibility is acceptable.
--
Josh Berkus
Containers & Databases Oh My!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ants Aasma | 2017-08-10 17:01:45 | Re: emergency outage requiring database restart |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-08-10 15:46:55 | Re: Remove 1MB size limit in tsvector |