Re: Add notification on BEGIN ATOMIC SQL functions using temp relations

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add notification on BEGIN ATOMIC SQL functions using temp relations
Date: 2025-09-21 17:34:15
Message-ID: 2736537.1758476055@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de> writes:
> That's indeed a much larger problem. Calling it from a session silently
> delivers a "wrong" result --- I was expecting an error.

Yeah, me too. See

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2736425.1758475979%40sss.pgh.pa.us

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2025-09-21 17:39:58 Re: We broke the defense against accessing other sessions' temp tables
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-09-21 17:32:59 We broke the defense against accessing other sessions' temp tables