Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64?
Date: 2010-11-16 14:45:12
Message-ID: 27353.1289918712@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:35, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> BTW, it seems like it'd be a good thing if we had a Win64 machine in the
>>> buildfarm.

>> Yes. I actually thought we had one. Dave, weren't you going to set one up?

> I was, but I saw one there so didn't bother (hamerkop). Windows
> buildfarm critters can take a surprising amount of herding...

hamerkop seems to have gone AWOL around the time of the git conversion.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-11-16 15:09:18 Re: track_functions default
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-11-16 14:42:41 Re: Isn't HANDLE 64 bits on Win64?