Re: WIP patch: collation assignment algorithm rewrite

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP patch: collation assignment algorithm rewrite
Date: 2011-03-21 03:07:51
Message-ID: 27348.1300676871@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> I've looked over the main code and it looks good. While I'm not totally
> conviced it has to be done as a seperate pass, this way is exceedingly
> readable and clear as to what is going on, which makes me much more
> confident of its correctness.

FWIW, I'm not at all confident that it's "correct". What I do think
is that this method will make it a lot easier to tweak the behavioral
details until we like them ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Piyush Newe 2011-03-21 05:40:01 Re: Rectifying wrong Date outputs
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2011-03-21 01:47:18 Re: pl/python tracebacks v2