Re: pg_dump.options.diff

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Serguei Mokhov <mokhov(at)cs(dot)concordia(dot)ca>, Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump.options.diff
Date: 2003-01-04 16:02:01
Message-ID: 27332.1041696121@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> As long as we're spending time on this, why not just write our own version
> of getopt_long()?

Seems like a fine idea to me ... who's volunteering?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-01-04 16:08:05 Re: [GENERAL] v7.3.1 Bundled and Released ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-01-04 15:53:41 Re: Upgrading rant.

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Giles Lean 2003-01-04 21:39:55 Re: Fix for HP-UX shared library builds
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-01-04 10:34:37 Re: ru: translation updates -- backend and libpq