Re: ldap/t/001_auth.pl fails with openldap 2.5

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Thomas Munro <tmunro(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ldap/t/001_auth.pl fails with openldap 2.5
Date: 2021-10-10 04:45:41
Message-ID: 273060.1633841141@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> So, does anybody see a reason not to go for the trivial
> [ patch ]

I'd be happy to rely on the buildfarm's opinion here.

> Although I'm mildly tempted to rewrap the parameters, it's kinda odd how the
> trailing parameter on one line, has its value on the next line.

I'm betting that perltidy did that. If you want to fix it so it
stays fixed, maybe reordering the parameters could help.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2021-10-10 08:12:48 Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2021-10-10 03:42:16 Re: Reword docs of feature "Remove temporary files after backend crash"