| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, david(at)fetter(dot)org, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu |
| Subject: | Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al. |
| Date: | 2010-10-21 17:57:59 |
| Message-ID: | 27301.1287683879@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I'm all for doing this client-side.
> Uh, why would we do this client-side rather than server-side? If we do
> it server-side, all interfaces get it.
1. The API that's being implemented is JDBC-specific.
2. Even if you want to argue that it would be generally useful to have
such a feature, it would certainly require additional client-side
programming to make each client interface make use of it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-10-21 17:59:04 | Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al. |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-10-21 17:50:53 | Re: Domains versus arrays versus typmods |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-10-21 17:59:04 | Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al. |
| Previous Message | dmp | 2010-10-21 17:57:01 | Re: Bug in DatabaseMetaData.getColumns() with columns based on domains |