Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, david(at)fetter(dot)org, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.
Date: 2010-10-21 17:49:24
Message-ID: 201010211749.o9LHnO317695@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > I'm all for doing this client-side.
>
> Well, that makes a big difference. Unless someone can make a
> convincing argument for why we should modify the server side to
> support this, I think we should just focus on this one client-side
> patch.
>
> I'd be happy to give it a closer look, but I may not be able to do so
> for a few weeks, and won't complain if someone beats me to it.

Uh, why would we do this client-side rather than server-side? If we do
it server-side, all interfaces get it.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-10-21 17:50:53 Re: Domains versus arrays versus typmods
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-10-21 17:36:16 Re: Domains versus arrays versus typmods

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message dmp 2010-10-21 17:57:01 Re: Bug in DatabaseMetaData.getColumns() with columns based on domains
Previous Message Thomas Kellerer 2010-10-21 12:57:03 Bug in DatabaseMetaData.getColumns() with columns based on domains