From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: \dt+ sizes don't include TOAST data |
Date: | 2010-01-25 02:38:14 |
Message-ID: | 27218.1264387094@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Florian Weimer wrote:
>> The sizes displayed by \dt+ in version 8.4.2 do not take TOAST tables
>> into account, presumably because the pg_relation_size does not reflect
>> that, either. I think this is a bit surprising. From a user
>> perspective, these are part of the table storage (I understand that
>> the indices might be a different story, but TOAST table are a fairly
>> deep implementation detail and should perhaps be hidden here).
> As of last week there's a new pg_table_size available that does what you
> want here:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2010-01/msg00288.php
> I don't believe \dt+ has been updated yet to use that though; that's
> worth considering for a minute, not sure anybody thought about it yet.
We could only use pg_table_size against a backend >= 9.0, which would
mean that the displayed results mean something different depending on
which backend version psql is being used with. That's not necessarily
a deal-breaker, but it does seem a bit evil.
An alternative worth thinking about is to make it use
pg_total_relation_size instead of pg_relation_size. That's available,
with similar semantics, in all versions that have pg_relation_size
either (ie, >= 8.1). Also, this is arguably more nearly the right thing
since at the level of \dt+ I think people would expect indexes to get
folded in too.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-01-25 03:04:18 | Re: \dt+ sizes don't include TOAST data |
Previous Message | Daniel Verite | 2010-01-24 23:39:10 | Re: Fwd: [LibPQ] Trying PQconnectStart: it doesn't seem to connect |