From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pitr question |
Date: | 2010-10-13 15:53:02 |
Message-ID: | 27214.1286985182@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Vick Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Geoffrey Myers
> <lists(at)serioustechnology(dot)com> wrote:
>>> 'In any case the hardware architecture must be the same shipping from,
>>> say, a 32-bit to a 64-bit system will not work.'
>> Is this specific to the hardware? That is to say, can I use pitr wal
>> shipping from 64 bit hardware to 64 bit hardware, where one machine is
>> running a 32 bit OS and the other is running a 64 bit OS?
> It applies to the OS. The OS determines the sizes of integers,
> padding alignment, etc. Running 32-bit OS on an amd64 class processor
> is the same as running it on a x86 class processor. Other processors
> (such as PowerPC) may behave differently, I don't know.
It's not really the OS but the build of Postgres. Most 64-bit OSes are
perfectly capable of running 32-bit executables. You can ship WAL from
one machine running a 32-bit Postgres executable to another one running
a 32-bit executable (of the same hardware architecture), regardless of
whether the hardware or the OS is 64-bit-capable on either end. But you
can't ship WAL between 32-bit and 64-bit executables.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | EDH | 2010-10-13 16:03:17 | Copying data files to new hardware? |
Previous Message | Geoffrey Myers | 2010-10-13 15:40:27 | Re: pitr question |