Mike Broers <mbroers(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> This is 9.5, sorry I didnt mention that in the initial post.
Hmm, that's odd then.
> I am guessing the issue is that the secondary non-indexed criteria is a
> search through a jsonb column?
Doubt it; it should have considered the plan you are thinking of anyway.
Maybe it did, but threw it away on some bogus cost estimate. If you could
produce a self-contained test case, I'd be willing to take a look.
regards, tom lane