Re: Jsonpath ** vs lax mode

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: Jsonpath ** vs lax mode
Date: 2021-01-29 00:02:19
Message-ID: 2719227.1611878539@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> The patch, which clarifies this situation in the docs is attached.
> I'm going to push it if no objections.

+1, but the English in this seems a bit shaky. Perhaps more
like the attached?

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
jsonpath-double-star-lax-docs-2.patch text/x-diff 1.0 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com 2021-01-29 00:46:49 RE: libpq debug log
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-01-28 23:20:21 Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend