"Denis Lussier" <denis(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> For various technical and backward compatibility reasons, I don't think
> SQL/PSM should be a replacement for PL/pgSQL. Although I do think it
> should heavily leverage the solid foundation afforded by the PL/pgSQL
> code base.
"Solid"? I've wanted for quite some time to throw away plpgsql and
start over --- there are too many things that need rewritten in it,
starting with the parser. This project would be a great place to do
that.
regards, tom lane