Re: ABI Compliance Checker GSoC Project

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
Cc: Mankirat Singh <mankiratsingh1315(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: ABI Compliance Checker GSoC Project
Date: 2026-01-10 20:34:29
Message-ID: 2718665.1768077269@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> writes:
> Anyone else interested in trying out the compliance checker on their build farm animals? It works only on Linux for now, I believe.

Now that we've more or less reduced the ABI compliance check to a
regular part of our process, it'd be good if baza were not a single
point of failure for making that check. Has the final version of
the BF client change been published anywhere? How about setup
instructions for its infrastructure? Ideally you'd get Andrew to
incorporate all that into the standard release of the BF client.

(My immediate ambition is that there ought to be a 32-bit animal
doing ABI checks too, since the conditions are different than
on 64-bit.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2026-01-10 20:41:38 Re: ABI Compliance Checker GSoC Project
Previous Message Tatsuya Kawata 2026-01-10 18:25:16 Re: [PATCH] Add sampling statistics to autoanalyze log output