Re: partitioned table + postgres_FDW not working in 9.3

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Lonni J Friedman <netllama(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: partitioned table + postgres_FDW not working in 9.3
Date: 2013-09-26 15:52:05
Message-ID: 27169.1380210725@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Lonni J Friedman <netllama(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Thanks for your reply. This sounds like a relatively simple
> workaround, so I'll give it a try. Is the search_path of the remote
> session that postgres_fdw forces considered to be intentional,
> expected behavior, or is it a bug?

It's intentional.

Possibly more to the point, don't you think your trigger function is
rather fragile if it assumes the caller has provided a particular
search path setting?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lonni J Friedman 2013-09-26 15:56:43 Re: partitioned table + postgres_FDW not working in 9.3
Previous Message Lonni J Friedman 2013-09-26 15:38:36 Re: partitioned table + postgres_FDW not working in 9.3