Re: Streaming replication status

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication status
Date: 2010-01-12 13:59:01
Message-ID: 2716.1263304741@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'm not sure whether poll(2) should be called for this purpose. But
> poll(2) and select(2) seem to often come together in the existing code.
> We should follow such custom?

Yes. poll() is usually more efficient, so it's preferred, but not all
platforms have it. (On the other side, I think Windows might have
only poll and not select.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-01-12 14:00:39 Re: Typed tables
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-01-12 13:53:51 Re: Typed tables