Re: is it possible to make this faster?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Postgresql Performance" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: is it possible to make this faster?
Date: 2006-05-26 17:07:39
Message-ID: 27137.1148663259@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

"Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> did you have a key on a,b,c?

Yeah, I did
create index t1i on t1 (a,b,c);
Do I need to use some other syntax to get it to work?

> select count(*) from (select a,b,max(c) group by a,b) q;
> blows the high performance case as does putting the query in a view.

I noticed that too, while trying to suppress the returning of the
results for timing purposes ... still a few bugs in their optimizer
obviously. (Curiously, EXPLAIN still claims that the index is being
used.)

> mysql> select user_id, acc_id, max(sample_date) from usage_samples group by 1,2
> [...]
> +---------+--------+------------------+
> 939 rows in set (0.07 sec)

> mysql> select user_id, acc_id, max(sample_date) from usage_samples group by 1,2
> [...]
> +---------+--------+------------------+--------------+
> 939 rows in set (1.39 sec)

I don't understand what you did differently in those two cases?
Or was there a DROP INDEX between?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2006-05-26 17:46:30 Re: is it possible to make this faster?
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2006-05-26 16:56:44 Re: is it possible to make this faster?