Re: guc comment changes (was Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: guc comment changes (was Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta)
Date: 2006-09-18 13:56:58
Message-ID: 27123.1158587818@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de> writes:
> I have the patch almost ready in the described form, if there is any chance
> it will make it into 8.2 I will clean it up and post it ASAP but Peter wrote
> me that chances are close to zero and so I stopped working on it for now.

If you'd mentioned it a bit sooner I would have encouraged you to get
it done. But given your description it sounds a bit too
hairy/potentially-destabilizing to be dropping in the day before beta.
(I certainly hadn't thought about custom vars at all :-()
Let's plan it for 8.3 instead.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gevik Babakhani 2006-09-18 14:02:56 OID conflicts
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-09-18 13:51:19 Re: -HEAD planner issue wrt hash_joins on dbt3 ?