Re: [PERFORM] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid
Date: 2006-05-12 15:53:56
Message-ID: 2711.1147449236@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com> writes:
>> My damn powerbook drive recently failed with very little warning

> It seems to me that S.M.A.R.T. reporting is a crock of shit. I've had ATA
> drives report everything OK while clearly in the final throes of death, just
> minutes before total failure.

FWIW, I replaced a powerbook's drive about two weeks ago myself, and its
SMART reporting didn't show a darn thing wrong either. Fortunately, the
drive started acting noticeably weird (long pauses seemingly trying to
recalibrate itself) while still working well enough that I was able to
get everything copied off it. I didn't wait for it to fail completely ;-)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tony Caduto 2006-05-12 15:56:17 Re: GUI Interface
Previous Message Tony Caduto 2006-05-12 15:50:42 Re: GUI Interface

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2006-05-12 16:09:27 Re: slow variable against int??
Previous Message Scott Ribe 2006-05-12 15:13:59 Re: [PERFORM] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid