Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
Cc: "Asko Oja" <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql
Date: 2008-08-22 00:36:51
Message-ID: 27079.1219365411@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> writes:
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:22:28 +0300
> "Asko Oja" <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> The idea would be to use psql as backend for some other system?
>> Or what do you mean by fed directly?

> No, I meant that one would do any ad hoc query and cut and paste the
> output directly into a tracking tool that supports ReST.

There's still the question of whether this covers any needs that aren't
met just as well by XML or CSV output formats.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-08-22 00:42:20 Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-08-22 00:34:24 Re: [HACKERS] [FINALLY] the TODO list has migrated to Wiki