Re: array support patch phase 1 patch

Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> 1.) In conjunction with the phase2 patch, which changes array_eq to do
> an element-by-element equality comparison, I discovered that type
> "aclitem" has no equality operator, and apparently nothing
> binary-coercible either. Should I invent "=" for aclitem, or have
> array_eq fall back to its original byte-by-byte comparison if it doesn't
> find an equality operator?

The former I would think.

> 2.) I noticed that if I start the postmaster without redirecting to a
> logfile, I see double error messages in psql. Is this intended?

Yeah, if postmaster stderr is coming to your console ...

regards, tom lane