| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support |
| Date: | 2018-01-30 00:39:33 |
| Message-ID: | 26c985bd-0635-402e-f78d-1c8b6111d02b@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/27/18 19:49, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> To open another can of worms, are we ever going to rename "ssl"
> parameters to "tls"
I had been thinking about that, too, but it doesn't seem worth it.
While renaming server-side settings might be feasible with some
annoyance, this would also include renaming libpq connection parameters
and APIs, which would be much more problematic.
I think most users actually still think about the whole topic as "SSL",
and the leading library is called "OpenSSL", so I think we're fine.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2018-01-30 00:57:44 | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-01-30 00:28:59 | Re: Add RANGE with values and exclusions clauses to the Window Functions |