Re: failure to drop table due to pg_temp_7 schema

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Peter 'PMc' Much <pmc(at)citylink(dot)dinoex(dot)sub(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at
Subject: Re: failure to drop table due to pg_temp_7 schema
Date: 2025-11-15 22:10:49
Message-ID: 26adadfe-6c51-4154-8ce1-409c2b800a29@aklaver.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 11/15/25 12:25, Peter 'PMc' Much wrote:

> In this case, I looked into what Rails now supports as a scheduler,
> and found it too elabore (for now) to grok in-depth. And a small
> and a bit older tool has an advantage, that one can quite easily
> understand it and, if need arises, make it do what is locally
> required. So it's a balance. And in recent years, the modernizations
> often happened to curtate in delightfulness (with PostgreSQL sadly
> not being an exception).

Where is delightfulness short changed in?:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/18/release-18.html#RELEASE-18-HIGHLIGHTS

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message pgmis 2025-11-16 19:43:47 RFC 9557 / IXDTF
Previous Message Peter 'PMc' Much 2025-11-15 20:25:47 Re: failure to drop table due to pg_temp_7 schema